Judge Dennis Friedrich granted the Daily Press’ motion for summary judgment in the suit, finding no genuine issue of material fact concerning the article in question.
“The only remedy would be an appeal,” Daily Press attorney Tom Kelley said Friday. “We’re pleased the court resolved the matter expeditiously and fairly.”
|
Advertisement |
Casebolt sued the paper over its coverage of the investigation and related issues. He took issue with the headline of a March 4 story about prior legal issues involving his companies.
However, Friedrich found that Casebolt hadn’t taken issue with statements in the article itself. “...the only challenge is to the headline, which repeats statements contained in the article,” he wrote.
He also found “no material fact at issue” concerning the portion of the article that was the basis of the headline.
The article read, in part: “Hi-Tech Metals refiners on Bill Road in Montrose was ultimately declared a Superfund site...”
“Plaintiff does not contest that he was in fact a principle of Hi-Tech Metals,” the ruling read. “There appears to be no material fact at issue with regard to the proposition in the body of the article that (Casebolt) was a principle involved with Hi-Tech Metals, that Hi-Tech Metals operated on Bill Road in Montrose, that ultimately the Bill Road site was determined and declared to be a Superfund site.”
Friedrich also pointed out that Casebolt was not financially responsible for the clean up at the Bill Road site, which was clearly stated in the March 4 article.
“The court finds...the statements contained in the article are not being challenged and that the only challenge is to the headline which repeats statements contained in the article.”
The ruling constitutes the final order and judgment and Casebolt’s action was dismissed with prejudice, Friedrich wrote.
Both the Daily Press and Casebolt were to assume their own costs and fees.
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!