Water roundtable won’t lobby on spending bill

 


Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, January 9, 2007 10:22 AM MST

Matt Hildner

Daily Press Writer

MONTROSE — The Gunnison Basin roundtable will leave the legislation to the legislators.

Advertisement
The roundtable decided Monday to abandon any attempts to lobby for the alteration of a spending bill that would forward $500,000 to the Colorado Water Conservation Board for the study of water projects around the state. The study would look at six projects, including one that would pump water out of the Gunnison Basin.

After more than an hour of debate, in which the roundtable concluded that opening up the spending bill might be a tempting invitation to Front Range legislators, it moved, instead, to request that the CWCB include the roundtable with the scope of work to spend the money should the legislation pass.

“Do you think you’ll have the political clout at the state house to preserve what you want without somebody from the East Slope doing what they want?” asked Bill Trampe, the Colorado River Water Conservation District’s representative to the roundtable.

The request for the study, made in the fall, sprang from a statewide water committee designed to come up with solutions to projected water shortages.

One of the study’s tasks would be to evaluate each project’s ability to yield three separate amounts of water, ranging in size from 100,000 acre feet to 250,000 acre feet.

Members of the roundtable objected to studying how to pump water out of the basin, while a number of in-basin questions remained unresolved.

Yet to be determined, they argued, is the amount of water needed to satisfy downstream demands on the Colorado River’s lower basin, endangered fish species, the operation of the Aspinall Unit and a water right for the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park.

Rick Brown, the state’s section chief for intrastate water management and development, said the language in the funding legislation would be kept broad to allow the study to look at a range of scenarios, including future downstream requirements.

“We’re not trying to make something happen. We’re trying to prevent something,” said John McClow, a roundtable member who opposed the legislation to fund the study. “We’re trying to keep the cart behind the horse.”

Both Trampe and Marc Catlin, the manager of the Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association, argued the roundtable shouldn’t shy away from any attempts to find out how much unappropriated water is in the basin.

“If we say we need (250,000 acre feet) of it, we might have a better shot at it than we do if we don’t do anything,” Catlin said.

Prior to the final vote, however, Gunnison County appointee Dennis Steckel questioned whether Keith Catlin, Marc’s father, would forward the roundtable’s wishes to the CWCB.

That move prompted a profanity-laced defense of his father from Marc before the senior Catlin weighed in.

“One thing I want everybody to know, is the water on the Western Slope is just as important to me as it is to anyone of you sitting around the table, and I’m not going to give it away,” Keith Catlin said.

Contact Matt Hildner via e-mail at matth@montrosepress.com
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)