Daily Press Writer
MONTROSE — Blue Mesa Reservoir could come close to filling again this year if forecasts hold, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
|
Advertisement |
The bureau’s forecasts predicted that Blue Mesa will come within a few feet of its July target elevation of 7,517 feet. As of Wednesday, its water level sat at an elevation of 7,486 feet.
“These forecasts can and do and will change. January is just kind of a starting point,” said Dan Crabtree, the bureau’s water management group chief for the western colorado area office.
Should Blue Mesa fill this summer, it would mark the second consecutive year the state’s largest reservoir has reached its capacity. Before last summer, it had gone seven years without filling.
Blue Mesa, Morrow Point and Crystal reservoirs combine to make up the Aspinall Unit and are managed by the Bureau of Reclamation to provide irrigation, hydropower, recreation and habitat for fish and wildlife.
All of the local water managers, along with the Bureau, hope the wet October that saw the Gunnison Basin receive over 150 percent of its 30-year average for that month will help the spring runoff.
The added soil moisture content in the basin could increase the amount of snowpack runoff that makes it down into reservoirs, although Coll Stanton, a hydraulic engineer with the bureau, warned that high temperatures and windy conditions during runoff could eat away at that advantage.
Later this spring the bureau hopes to start gathering data for a hydrology model that could be used for an environmental impact statement for the Colorado pikeminnow and the razorback sucker. The two have been listed by the federal government as endangered species and occupy the lower stretch of the Gunnison below Delta.
But the EIS has been stalled by the legal battle to secure a water right for the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park.
John McClow, attorney for the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, said the U.S. Department of Justice was attempting to narrow down the more than 380 parties who opposed the park’s 2001 filing to quantify a water right.
“The effort is being made to condense that to a more reasonable group,” McClow said, adding that the first target would likely be to reduce the opposition to the 43 parties actually represented by attorneys.
A status conference for the case is scheduled on March 1.
Contact Matt Hildner via e-mail at matth@montrosepress.com
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!