Protesters mark Roe v. Wade anniversary

 


Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:03 AM MST

Matt Hildner

Daily Press Writer

MONTROSE — A group of 12 people gathered at the intersection of Main Street and Townsend Avenue during Monday evening’s rush hour, braving chilly temperatures to mark the 34th anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement
Unlike most anniversaries, though, this was not a celebration.

Instead, the protesters were there to signal their opposition to the 1973 Supreme Court decision that limits the ability of the states and Congress to outlaw or restrict access to abortion.

“The only successful solution to the Roe v. Wade decision would be for it to be reversed,” said Gayla Bourelle, a member of San Juan Right to Life and a board member of Life Choices Pregnancy Center. “It needs to be reversed completely.”

“I believe that life begins at conception, and a baby is God’s greatest gift. To destroy that gift is just not right,” she said.

Across the nation, pro-choice groups also marked the decision. The National Organization for Women saluted the case for recognizing a woman’s constitutional right to abortion and included remembrances of women who died from illegal and unsafe abortions on its Web site.

Planned Parenthood chose the anniversary as a chance to urge both supporters and opponents of the decision to focus on developing a “prevention-first” health care agenda that would reduce unintended pregnancy and the need for abortion.

But at the corner of Main and Townsend, pro-life supporters were alone in marking the case’s anniversary.

Jamie Mawhorter and her husband Paul were on the corner with their adopted daughters Emma and Maggie.

The Mawhorters, who tried for nine years to have biological children, hoped by being on the corner Monday they could remind people that there are alternatives to abortion.

“We have so many young girls here and we just want them to know they have alternatives and abortion is not the way,” Jamie said.

Jamie held that in cases of rape or incest, adoption would still be the best choice.

“I think the unborn child has a right and needs to have a voice,” she said. “They can still bring the child into life and have an adoption.”

Dale Bourelle, Gayla’s husband, was even more succinct.

“Two wrongs don’t make a right, it’s just that simple,” he said. “That baby, no matter what stage it’s in, never had a choice in any form of its development.”

Although Montrose is a long ways from the steps of the Supreme Court in Washington D.C., Gayla Bourelle said protesting the court’s decision was an important step in reducing abortion, which she said takes the life of one baby for every four that are born.

“I believe that it’s just bringing awareness in front of people,” she said. “If one girl were to change her mind about having an abortion, I’d feel like my life was well-lived.”

Contact Matt Hildner via e-mail at matth@montrosepress.com
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments

    marqthompson wrote on Feb 1, 2010 3:21 AM:

    " This is a wonderful article. The things given are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
    --------
    marqthompson
    Noosa real estate "

    Kaitlyn Heichel wrote on Nov 3, 2009 2:01 PM:

    " My dad was Robert Heichel and i just wanted to thank again everyone that helped looked for him. It was over 3 years ago that he died, but i will never forget him. I think about him still every single day and life without him is so hard. Thank you everyone who spent time looking for him. I wish this could have been a happy ending but life isn't fair. My dad died when i was 12 and i am now almost 16. Thank you again for everything you guys have done. Your amazing. "

    Sarah Bond wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:31 PM:

    " It really makes me sick that people lie about certain events to make themselves look better than they really are... Just to set the record straight, one of those stories is extremely false. Email me if you want the real story from the person who was actually there. "


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)