Daily Press Writer
MONTROSE — Nearly two weeks after filing objections to an agreement reached between Upper Gunnison Basin water users and the federal government in 2003, the state’s attorney general has filed a motion to withdraw it.
|
Advertisement |
The agreement in question regards stipulations protecting the water rights of ranchers and other users from the government’s reserved water right for the Black Canyon of the Gunnison.
Davis said the motion was filed to allow the state to withdraw its objection with “leave of the court to file them again later.”
Frank Kugel said he believes there was “a broad base of support” for those who filed the stipulations and they felt the state had not lived up to its original commitment when it filed the objections. The state was closely involved with and provided input to those stipulations when they were filed, he said.
Kugel is general manager for the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District.
“I’m cautiously optimistic that this (the withdrawal) will set aside our differences and allow both the state and Upper Gunnison water users to forge an agreement with the federal government on the Black Canyon case,” he said.
Presently, the water users face no immediate threat of a call being made on the Black Canyon’s water rights, as it has not quantified them.
Of the 106 water users’ filings for the stipulations, 22 have been signed by the water court judge.
“The judge is prepared to sign those other remaining stipulations once all the opposition is withdrawn,” Kugel said.
Meanwhile, several meetings have been scheduled to allow parties to discuss their positions on the issue. A meeting at 7:30 a.m., May 2 with both the state’s house and senate agriculture and natural resources committees is scheduled provide an opportunity for interested parties to review the state’s position on the issue and explain opposition, Kugel said.
Proceedings will be broadcast through the Colorado General Assembly Web site at http://www.leg.state.co.us.
However, Mike King, deputy director of the Department of Natural Resources said after a meeting Friday the clashing sides are making “enough progress that the need for the meeting may no longer be there.”
He said such a decision will be left to the elected officials, but that he feels the process is likely “back on track.”
Kugel said conflicts might not be over.
“We anticipate a battle further down the line to iron out selective subordination,” Kugel said. “At least this (the withdrawal) will allow us to move forward.”
Selective subordination allows the water users to secure their rights to the source, despite the Black Canyon’s seniority.
The Black Canyon’s water rights date back to 1933, whereas most of the water users’ rights were filed about 1941. Colorado water law is based on the prior appropriation doctrine, which emphasizes “first in time, first in right.”
Davis said this factors into the state’s April 16 objection filing.
“The stipulations created selective calls, which we think are contrary to priority administration,” she said. “We also filed these because we were concerned (Department of Wildlife) water rights would be injured by the stipulations.”
In addition, she said the objections were also filed because Upper Gunnison had asked the court to order a deadline for them.
Contact Robert Allen via e-mail at roberta@montrosepress.com
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!