Development sparks debate during river district seminar

 

By Marissa Brunner
Daily Press Writer
Published/Last Modified on Friday, September 14, 2007 10:37 PM MDT

GRAND JUNCTION — It practically goes without saying that water’s a hot topic in Colorado. However, energy development has recently been added to the mix, prompting some water officials to question the quality and quantity of the state’s future water supply.

Friday, people from across the state gathered for the Colorado River District’s Annual Water Seminar in Grand Junction, ready to dissect certain aspects of the oil and shale industry, and how it ties into water.

Colorado River District President Bill Trampe said a crossroads has been reached in the world of water, and that population growth, energy development, recreation and the environment all play a role in the uncertainty of future supply.

Advertisement
“Anyone who knows anything about water knows that the Colorado River has a limited supply,” Trampe said. “Many people think with the changing climate that maybe we have a diminishing supply. So when you start talking about all of these issues together, it’s a very uncertain future.”

Higher gas prices after hurricanes Rita and Katrina has driven the energy industry, prompting more resources to be tapped into, Brian Macke said. Macke is the director of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

Steve Gunderson, who is the director of the Water Quality Control Division at the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, said that water near drilling sites is susceptible to containing high levels of salinity.

Gunderson said high-salinity water is perfectly fine for livestock, and in fact is often sought out by ranchers. However, the same water that is good for cattle can wreak havoc on crops. So somewhere along the line, Gunderson said, a balance must be struck to ensure there is enough water for both agricultural uses.

“We don’t have enough resources, but having said that, we have been making progress,” Gunderson said, adding that Garfield County in particular has seen an increase of energy development staff in the last two to three years.

Gunderson said he was not sure if oil and gas activities across the state have significantly harmed the quality of the Colorado River.

“We’ll have to see how the trends occur. If we see changes, we’ll get a handle on that,” he said.

Increasing oil shale development sides may seem like a controversial issue to some, but to others, like Jeff Devere, it’s an absolute necessity. Devere is the assistant town manager of Rangely, with specific duties in community and economic development, information technology, GIS and risk management.

He said when he heard people were surprised by the idea of drilling sites popping up around the state, he was surprised himself, because energy development has been ongoing in Rangely for decades.

“Power is a tremendous thing, and very much necessary,” Devere said. “It should be no surprise that they’re going to go out and find natural gas — society needs it desperately.”

What needs to happen in terms of energy development and water is better balance and  open communication, according to Dr. John Redifer, executive director of the Natural Resource and Land Policy Institute at Mesa State College.

“We need to have an honest dialogue about what those risks and problems are and find solutions,” Redifer said, referring to the controversy between oil shale development and water quality.

Brian Hall, a senior economics major at Colorado College and a former researcher with the State of the Rockies Project, said that through proper enforcement, energy development could pose a subtle threat to water. By conducting studies in oil development areas in Wyoming, Hall was able to conclude that with development comes smaller unemployment rates, higher housing values and lower instances of crime.

Contact Marissa Brunner via e-mail at marissab@montrosepress.com
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)