“We’ll see all vantage points, I think,” MRD Executive Director Dean Palmquist said.
A panel of speakers, each with unique perspectives, will discuss expansion options and feasibility. A moderator will be present and the public will be encouraged to share as well. The discussion will follow an informational presentation of 45 minutes to an hour.
|
Advertisement |
Tax increases to finance the district’s expansion have twice been voted down in recent years. In November, a ballot initiative for a public contribution of $5 million toward a 30,000-square-foot expansion of the Aquatic Center did not pass. District staff have since been working to find grants and explore possibilities.
The Colorado Department of Local Affairs was prepared to give the district a $500,000 Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Grant pending approval of the ballot initiative in November. Palmquist had hoped to have the offer extended until the district could come up with another proposal.
“They asked us to reapply,” he said. “They basically said, ‘Your election wasn’t successful. We’re going to have to terminate the contract.’”
He said the district is keeping its options open as far as whether the next proposal will also involve an Aquatic Center expansion or perhaps a standalone facility, and that it’s possible a proposal will be on the ballot this November.
He said he intends to discuss Monday the district’s needs, who will benefit and what options are currently under review.
Montrose resident Joe Bagnara will present an opposing viewpoint to the Aquatic Center expansion Monday.
“The whole purpose of the recreation district, theoretically, is to provide a place for kids to be involved,” Bagnara said. “The kids who need it most can’t afford to pay for recreation district offerings.”
He said that using tax money to pay for facilities that require additional fees for their services creates a situation where the benefits aren’t available to folks of lower income.
“The burden’s gonna fall on everybody, but everybody’s not gonna be able to take advantage of it and that’s not fair.”
Bagnara has compiled opposition he’s received and written a “position paper” that cites this and many other reasons against the expansion.
Richard Harding will also participate in the panel. He was part of the successful Montrose Citizens for Funding Our Future campaign that helped pass ballot measures in the last election to increase taxes in support of public safety and roads. He presented the Aquatic Center expansion proposal to Painted Sky Resource Conservation and Development Council, an entity that helps find grants.
“I hate funding recreation facilities with tax dollars because there’s so much grant money out there,” Harding said.
The 55,000 square-foot Bill Heddles Recreation Center in Delta was financed through the help of a 1 percent sales tax. Former Delta Parks and Recreation Director Rich Englehart said it cost about $3.1 million when it was built in 1991.
“That place is rocking all the time,” Englehart said. “These public facilities are very well supported. I wish them (MRD) luck.”
One of the problems the Montrose Recreation District faces is that it must rent space around town to host many of its activities. The Delta center hosts many of the same activities, all under one roof.
Contact Robert Allen via e-mail at roberta@montrosepress.com
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!