“I think it was a good dialogue,” Montrose resident Joe Bagnara said Tuesday.
The seven-person panel included voices of the district, the opposition, the Black Canyon Boys and Girls Club, a physician and a local athletic club owner. For more than two hours they exchanged opinions and statistics and answered audience questions.
  
Advertisement |
MRD youth coordinator Justin Mashburn said Monday that in 2007, the district had 120 cancellations. Some of these were the result of scheduling conflicts with rented space, as the owners’ events and programs take precedence to those of the district.
Efforts to expand district facilities through tax increases have been shot down by the public, most recently in November 2007’s ballot initiative for residents to pay for $5 million of a $6 million Aquatic Center expansion.
MRD executive director Dean Palmquist said Tuesday that the district is exploring alternative methods of financing as well as how to avoid duplicating services.
“I’m still wondering to this day if the Rec District should join with the Boys and Girls club,” Palmquist said. “I think we need to revisit that — that’s what we came away with after that meeting.”
Communication and collaboration among entities with similar goals were topics brought up numerous times Monday. Residents questioned whether it’s necessary for MRD to function as an entity separate from Montrose County.
“I think that we as a community need to have either an office, an ombudsman or some entity that really works with every one of those (separate) entities,” Bagnara said. “If we’re gonna have all these special districts, then we need to have somebody who is coordinating.”
Residents have questioned why MRD lines don’t include Olathe, though Olathans are allowed to participate in district activities.
“I think that the Rec District outline — or the border — needs to be the county outline,” Bagnara said.
Bagnara’s “position paper” Monday included concerns that low-income families wouldn’t be able to afford admission fees to MRD programs.
Palmquist said the scholarship programs the district offers give out $1,200 to $1,300 annually, allowing anyone to participate.
“We’ve never turned a kid away from our programs,” Palmquist said.
Olathe resident Richard Harding was on Monday’s panel. He explained statistics showing that youth delinquency prevention costs significantly less to communities than incarceration.
“I’ll guarantee you we’re gonna pay for it one way or another. We’re either gonna pay to confine them in Grand Mesa (Youth Detention Facility) or we’re gonna provide the facilities here to address the needs of those children,” Harding said.
He has taken an active role in helping MRD find grant money.
The district has expressed its intention to be a family-friendly facility as opposed to local fitness centers, which cater more to adults.
Montrose Athletic Club owner Mead Serra said MRD expansion will inevitably interfere with local private fitness centers.
“When you build a facility that mimics the exact same facility I have, it’s competition — but then it’s not competition because ... rec districts and rec centers notoriously run in the red and they don’t pay taxes,” Serra said. “Its gonna be a butt-kicking at the end of the day, because I just can’t compete.”
The possibility of MRD purchasing the MAC for its programs was addressed, as it would cost less than for the district to build a new facility. Palmquist said Tuesday he had some concerns with this.
“We could explore it out further, but the initial (thought) is, I believe, you’d be trying to force-fit a building and it wouldn’t adequately meet the needs of the community,” Palmquist said.
Montrose County hosted Monday’s forum, but stated it remains neutral regarding the MRD expansion issue.
Contact Robert Allen via e-mail at roberta@montrosepress.com
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!