Bond for proposed uranium mill subject of debate

 

By Lisa Huynh
Daily Press Writer
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, April 5, 2008 4:11 AM MDT

MONTROSE — Although Energy Fuels Resources Corporation is dozens of approvals away from getting the green light on its Pinon Ridge uranium mill, a bond the state would require of the project is being debated.

This financial surety is money made available to the state by the company for decommissioning operations, including waste clean-up.

The bond was referred to at recent open houses as a way of addressing public and environmental health concerns. It was also criticized by those who say such bonds fall short of true clean-up costs.

Advertisement
As part of its licensing application, Energy Fuels must come up with an amount, a financial assurance or a surety, it estimates would cover the cost of decommissioning its facility, said Steve Tarlton, unit leader, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Radiation Management Unit. The state reviews and modifies this amount as required.

“We add to the cost they would come up (with) or modify their estimates to account for how the state would go about implementing decommissioning,” said Tarlton.

The estimated amount would include costs of site monitoring, operation shutdown, decommissioning contracts and legal expenses.

The Cotter uranium processing mill within Fremont County has two warranties with the state: one related to its Superfund issues is about $6 million; another warranty for mill operations is around $14 to $15 million.

Before a company receives a license, it is required to provide financial insurance. Regardless of the method, all the money must be directly available to the state, and the amount cannot change without state approval, Tarlton said.

Public hearings are held as part of the licensing application review. Once a license is issued, all items in the financial assurance are annually evaluated and modified, he said.

“We might adjust the amount up or down based on what’s happened at the facility during that year,” Tarlton said.

For example, Energy Fuels is proposing to build several enclosures for storing radioactive waste produced by the mill. The act of closing these cells, if approved by the state, could reduce the company’s financial warranty “because a potential problem has been eliminated,” he said.

“We try very hard to keep those financial sureties amount current throughout the life of the license.”

Another requirement of the licensing applicant is to complete a year of baseline monitoring to collect data on current qualities of air, surface and ground water, said Tarlton. Energy Fuels is currently working on monitoring its proposed mill.

The formal review process does not start until the company submits its application, which it has publicly stated it plans to do at the beginning of next year, Tarlton said.

DPHE has a little less than 15 months to review the application and make a decision on it. This timeframe cannot be delayed.

For more information on the licensing process and requirements, visit: www.cdphe.state.co.us/HM/rad/index.htm

Contact Lisa Huynh at lisah@montrosepress.com
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)