Still, the county’s resolution supporting Senate Bill 187 went through Monday, after Commissioner Bill Patterson seconded a motion brought by Commissioner Gary Ellis.
The bill would require homes being sold, transferred or constructed on or after July 1 to have a working carbon monoxide detector within 10 feet of each room used for sleeping purposes.
|
Advertisement |
Ellis referred to two Olathe deaths in January when he presented the county’s resolution of support.
In January, Julian “Russ” Beamer, 72, and his infant grandson, Truett Simoens, were found dead in Beamer’s home from what the coroner later ruled was acute carbon monoxide poisoning.
Beamer’s wife, Phyllis, was found in critical condition, but survived after being rushed to a hospital.
Ellis had presented the resolution at the request of Tony Licwinko, executive director of Sunrise Creek Assisted Living Center.
Licwinko was unable to attend Monday’s meeting because another matter came up, but told the Daily Press he supports the bill on behalf of his sales manager, Heather Simoens, who is Truett’s mother and Beamer’s daughter-in-law.
“I’m definitely all for it,” Simoens said during a phone interview.
“Had this been in effect before, my son would still be alive. Carbon monoxide is a silent killer. People are not aware enough. If this act goes into place, it’s going to save more lives than they realize.”
She pointed out that smoke alarms are already mandatory, as are seat belts.
“I personally saw the value of it (SB187),” Ellis said during the meeting, adding later that carbon monoxide detectors, which retail from $20 and up, are relatively inexpensive.
“This is way, way beyond the role of government, requiring individuals in their own homes (to get detectors),” Belt dissented. “That is Big Brother, excessive government. Why would they stop there?”
He said it was possible the government would begin requiring homeowners to install sprinkler systems and other safety devices.
“I think this is a terrible bill,” Belt said.
Ellis said he’d considered it from a public safety standpoint. “It’s such a silent killer,” he said of carbon monoxide. “To me, it made sense.”
Belt was the lone no vote. “And I hope to God this bill fails,” he added.
Belt later said he had “a great deal of sympathy” for the Simoens and Beamer families, but it was customary to take suggestions to Colorado Counties Incorporated before individual boards of commissioners voted to support particular legislation.
“I feel very strongly that government has no place coming into private homes...It’s government micromanaging at a level I do not like at all,” he said.
“I know there’s been some disastrous cases of carbon monoxide deaths over the years, but I simply draw the line at the government coming into your house and telling you you have to have a carbon monoxide detector.”
Belt said it would be better if public officials warned consumers about the dangers of carbon monoxide and suggest, but not mandate, detectors.
Licwinko said he didn’t see why people view the bill as an intrusion. “There was opposition in Colorado Springs from people who felt it was nanny government,” he said.
“I don’t know how you could think it was nanny government. It’s no different than a smoke alarm.”
Simoens was aware of opposition from builders and real estate associations, but said SB187 was “definitely not” Big Brother.
A carbon monoxide detector would have saved her family, she reiterated. “They would all be here. Phyllis is still with us, but carbon monoxide stays with you forever. I think, in general, most people are (in support).
“It just makes sense.”
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!