MHS, OHS teams take the track at state meet

 

By Robin Washut
Daily Press Writer
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, May 17, 2008 4:13 AM MDT

It wasn’t a perfect day for the Olathe High track and field team, but it was about as good as it could’ve hoped for.

Olathe saw its athletes reach the finals in two of its four total events in the first day of the Class 3A state meet in Pueblo, as Wes Byers reached in the 200-meter dash and Kayla Matthews took second overall in the high jump.

“They did a great job today,” OHS coach Jerry Hollingshead said. “Obviously we would’ve liked to see all our kids get to the finals, but Wes and Kayla both did fantastic jobs.”

Advertisement
Byers moved on to today’s final round in the 200 after just missing the cut in the 100, as he took ninth and needed to place in the top-8 to move on.

Matthews made a huge jump from 12th overall to first place after clearing 5-2 in the high jump. The overall winner bettered her mark by three inches, but her performance was still good enough to send her to the podium for the first time.

“That was a fantastic job by Kayla,” Hollingshead said. “It was great performance by her, and it was exciting to see her up there on the medal podium.”

Olathe also had its girls’ medley relay team in action, but the foursome of Ariana Perez, Briana Vigil, Katrina Harris and Morgan Stansberry came just a half-second shy of making the top-8.

Along with the 200, Byers will be competing in today’s second day in the long jump, while the boys’ and girls’ 4x800 relay team and long jumper Tiffany Matthews will also be in action.

The Montrose High track and field team had five of its seven athletes compete on the first day of the Class 4A state meet in Denver, but none were able to advance to the finals in the respective events.

The boys 4x800-meter relay team of Chirs Hay, Kris Ferguson and Michael Wallendorff and senior Kyle Masterson failed to reach the finals despite finishing 14th with a time comparable to the one they posted at last weekend’s regional meet.

The only other Montrose athlete in action was shot putter Natalia Figgs, who finished 20th overall and failed to advance to the finals.

“It wasn’t her best, and it was definitely and eye-opener being at the state tournament and going up against a lot bigger girls,” Nething said. “But she competed. That’s what we ask for, and it was a good experience for her being a junior. She’s going to be a good little thrower next year.”

Montrose will have three athletes competing in today’s second day action, as Hay returns to run the boys’ 3,200 and Josh White will throw in the shot put. Wendy Huber will also compete in the discus.

“Hopefully tomorrow we can make a dent and get some kids into the finals,” Nething said.

Contact Robin Washut via e-mail at robinw@montrosepress.com
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)