The Delta Police Department issued a summons in May to Jay Baker, accusing him of misdemeanor cruelty to animals. According to the district attorney’s office, formal charges hadn’t been filed as of Tuesday morning.
Police said Baker was completing court-ordered useful public service hours at the shelter last December.
|
Advertisement |
Police said Baker told another person about the incident, and that individual contacted them in recent weeks. The investigation concluded May 19.
“What I think is important is, although this individual has (allegedly) admitted to the offense, he still has his day in court,” Delta Police Chief Robert Thomas said. “The allegation must be proven.”
Thomas said it looked to be an isolated incident — and unusual. The former Boulder police commander, who took over as DPD’s chief in April, said he has never before handled a case like Baker’s.
“He (Baker) never denied,” Delta Police spokeswoman Jamie Head said, referring to information in police reports. “In fact, he was very forthcoming when questioned. For the animal’s sake, and for the animal resource center’s sake, it was not as bad as we initially thought it was going to be.”
But the allegations were enough to trigger policy changes, Thomas and Head said, pledging accountability to the community.
The Delta shelter is a work site for the Delta courts’ useful public service program. Program clients have to obtain the approval of the animal resource center and the DPD commander who supervises the center.
Volunteers and useful public service clients are not allowed to have animals out of cages until they know the shelter’s cleaning processes. Baker was monitored except for when walking the dog.
“Since this has occurred, we have been in the process of re-evaluating our procedure of approving workers at the work site,” Head said. “Obviously, we weren’t fully aware of the background. It has raised some questions.”
The DPD has temporarily removed the animal resources center from the useful public service program’s work site list.
“We just want to re-evaluate how these people are getting approved,” Head said. “... We definitely don’t want anything like this to ever happen again.”
Thomas said he was not going to second-guess the administration prior to his, but instead was acting to correct mistakes and be accountable.
“We could have kept silent on this, and no one would ever know, but I don’t think that’s the right thing to do,” he said.
“We may be criticized and we may not be criticized, but all I want to do is the right thing.”
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!