These areas are suffering from billions in maintenance backlog and a chronic operating shortfall estimated at $750 million annually, according to the National Parks Conservation Association.
This year, we stand to give the parks a much deserved and overdue financial boost in time for an upcoming milestone.
|
Advertisement |
Version 1253, co-sponsored by Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colorado, proposes matching federal and private funds; while 2817, sponsored by Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colorado, looks to conservation royalties from unanticipated offshore oil and gas revenue.
Both bills are moving too sluggishly through the process, and have not gone as far as we should hope.
Montrose counts itself among the fortunate areas surrounded by not one but several parks. For this reason perhaps, we have an exceptionally robust appreciation for the National Park Service System, which manages all the national parks, many National Monuments, conservation and historical properties.
Within a short drive, we have the Black Canyon of the Gunnison, Curecanti and Colorado National Monument. Add a few hours and there’s Mesa Verde, the Great Sand Dunes and Florissant Fossil Beds.
As Black Canyon veteran Paul Zaenger recently told the Daily Press: The National Parks are a kind of constant in our world, even when change brings discomfort.
“We might not get to sail around the world this year, but incredible experiences still await. I’m hoping people will find renewal in our national parks and region.”
This week the New York Times wrote an editorial highlighting the House versions of these Centennial challenge measures, saying the legislation “deserves a serious push.”
NPS Director Mary A. Bomar said earlier this year the federal agency looks forward to the day Congress passes Centennial Challenge legislation so that through 2016 there will be federal money available to match up to $100 million a year of donations.
We agree, and we hope the day comes soon.
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!