Kennel operator fined; Olathe facility did not renew license

 

By Katharhynn Heidelberg
Daily Press Senior Writer
Published/Last Modified on Friday, July 18, 2008 4:16 AM MDT

MONTROSE — Kennel operator Nita Smith pleaded guilty to animal cruelty last week and is no longer in business after not renewing her license.

Smith’s Olathe business, Colorow Kennels, came under the fire of animal-rights activists last year, after the state agriculture department investigated and found violations of the Pet Animal Care Facilities Act.

The kennel was deemed to have failed an inspection in November, but was not subject to immediate closure under state rules. The state investigators’ report noted fecal matter, rats and rodent droppings in the facilities, and said a puppy had been found dead before the inspection.

Advertisement
Colorow Kennels complied with remedies investigators laid out, the ag department said previously.

However, Montrose County filed a local charge of cruelty to animals-neglect/mistreat in December, over a Pomeranian whose ulcerated eye went untreated.

According to court records, Smith was sentenced July 8 to fines, court costs and restitution totaling $389.

Paonia-based Citizens for Animal Welfare and Shelter led the charge to get Smith shut down. The organization was pleased with the guilty plea, member Debbie Faulkner said.

“That’s what we wanted. I would have hoped the fines would’ve been a little higher, but we never wanted her to have jail time. That wasn’t the point,” Faulkner said.

“So we are elated. Now we are going to wait to see if the state does close her. We’re hoping that this will do it.”

Because Smith did not renew her license, state-mandated closure would be a moot point, ag department spokeswoman Christi Lightcap said.

“If she ever did apply for another one, it (her conviction) would greatly affect whether she did receive another license. We’re under the assumption she’s not operating at this time,” she said.

Lightcap said a state investigator was in the area earlier this week. “We’re keeping an eye on the facility, but she doesn’t have a license with us right now.”

The state can revoke licenses in certain circumstances — for instance, when there have been three consecutive failed facilities inspections, or when there are convictions for cruelty — but considers kennels on a case-by-case basis.

Smith has a 2005 municipal court conviction for misdemeanor animal cruelty.

The state did not act against her license at the time, finding that though she was accused of throwing a cat from a vehicle, the ag department believed it had escaped the vehicle. The department’s report noted the cat was found uninjured.

According to court records, Smith had been convicted at trial; the case was closed in 2006.

“Any time there’s even one conviction, it’s unfortunate,” Lightcap said. “It would be unlikely we would ever reissue her a license, but we still take them on a case-by-case basis.”
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)