Perkins said the Olathe Police Department — funded at around $300,000 per year — is just one of many town departments being examined due to budgetary issues. Perkins confirmed the town has approached Montrose County Sheriff Rick Dunlap for talks, but said no decision has been made.
“We’re looking at all departments. It’s not just the police department,” he said Tuesday. “No one, including the police department, should take it that way.”
|
Advertisement |
“I didn’t call and say, ‘Hey, would you take over the police department,’” the mayor said. Dunlap confirmed being contacted six weeks ago. He said he and Perkins also met Tuesday.
“He threw out the suggestion that they would be interested in a proposal from the sheriff’s office to provide law enforcement for the city of Olathe,” Dunlap said, later stating the idea was only in the “talking phase.”
“If you don’t ask the questions, you’ll never get the answers,” Perkins said. “In some circles, I’m the most hated person in Olathe today. In some circles, it’s ‘We should’ve thought of this before.’”
He said he called other town board members to inform them of the sheriff’s interest.
Further discussions were to be held in executive session next Monday; however, Perkins said, no decision would be made at that time and the public would have ample opportunity to comment.
Olathe Police Chief Ric Hawk said he only learned of the talks Monday and was still trying to inform all of his officers Tuesday.
“I don’t think it’s a good idea and I don’t think it’s good for the community,” Hawk said.
Hawk oversees five officers and departmental administrative staff for the town of about 1,700. He said contracting out law enforcement services would cause Olathe to lose the personal relationship between officers and the community, and all the advantages that go with it. Additionally, he feared the direction of law enforcement would no longer be under local control.
Other municipalities in Montrose County contract with the sheriff’s office for municipal enforcement.
The towns of Nucla and Naturita did not have an existing municipal police force when they entered into contracts last year. The contracts paid for another deputy to be added to the roster at the West End sheriff’ substation, which allowed Dunlap to provide an officer for municipal enforcement duties.
Dunlap said he was gathering information about Olathe’s call volume in order to determine how many deputies would have to be assigned to the town under a contract.
He said it was likely the deputy or deputies would be stationed in Olathe full-time, but whether the town would provide a substation office was yet another thing to be discussed.
“Before we can go any further, we’ve got to have some information from them, too,” Dunlap said. “There’s a lot of things that have to go into this before we can present them with a proposal.”
The suggestion is no different than talking to the Montrose Recreation District about taking over activities in Olathe, Perkins said.
“I don’t want the police department to be trivialized,” he said, adding that the town board’s responsibility is to wisely spend the public’s money, so it’s a matter of whether a law enforcement contract proves financially feasible.
“This (idea) has been bounced around for years by a lot of people,” Perkins said. “... To say I’m looking at getting rid of the police department is a misstatement.”
Olathe Town Administrator Scott Harold could not be reached for comment Tuesday. Others who called the Daily Press with concerns did not speak on the record.
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!