$300K settlement reached in forest fire

 

By Staff
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:25 PM MST

DENVER — Two men, who passed a lit cigarette lighter, allegedly triggering a 120-acre fire five years ago, have settled their case with the U.S. Forest Service.

The settlement agreement was not an admission of liability.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office announced Tuesday that John Wesson and Dwight Allen reached a settlement with the Department of Justice and the Forest Service concerning expenses the government incurred for suppressing the 2003 Alta Fire in the Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre National Forest.

Advertisement
Wesson and Allen were held jointly and severally responsible for a $300,000 fire suppression bill; according to the USAO’s news release, Wesson’s homeowners insurance will pay the compensation.

According to the news release, Wesson and Allen were on National Forest land in San Miguel County July 10, 2003, when they reportedly passed around a lit cigarette lighter in violation of a fire ban. The Forest Service claimed the lighter ignited aspen cotton fluff that was floating in the air, which then blew up into the Alta Fire four miles south of Telluride.

“Fire bans are not issued frivolously by government agencies,” Jackie Parks, USFS Rocky Mountain Region Acting Deputy Regional Forester said in the news release.

“As we have seen previously in our region, failure to observe these bans can have devastating impacts and result in high suppression costs. I am pleased that we have been able to recoup some of these taxpayer costs.”

 
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)