"We do a community survey approximately every four years to see what the community thinks of the hospital and what they would like to see from us," said Leann Tobin, spokeswoman for MMH.
Of those surveyed, about 74 percent said they had their most recent experience at MMH. When provided reasons why they used that facility, 63 percent said it was location and 57 percent said it was because of the medical doctor they selected.
|
Advertisement |
Results showed that only 51 percent of respondents said they were seen by a doctor the same day when urgently needed. Five percent said it took two weeks or more.
The hospital rated high in good equipment and courteous and attentive staff.
About 61 percent said there was the right number of doctors, compared to 55.8 percent in 2004.
"My first feeling is that we always want to be better, but in just about every field that was surveyed, we improved over the last survey that was taken," said board president Wallace Belden.
The survey showed strong competition from St. Mary's for cancer and heart problems, but much less than what was shown in the 2004 survey.
"I was quite pleased," Belden said. "The out migration is not nearly as bad as we had been led to believe."
The survey showed that the hospital's outpatient and inpatient experiences are general good to very good.
"We will be developing plans to meet some of our weaknesses," Belden said.
The hospital was recently evaluated by The Joint Commission, an accreditation agency that looks into workings of hospitals from customer satisfaction to level of care. According to the preliminary results, Belden said they hospital did a "very fine job" in that evaluation.
The community survey was conducted by Avatar International. Out of 3,000 surveyed, there were 528 responses. There were 347 responses in 2004. Margin of error is plus or minus 1.5 percent.

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!