Alvarado bail remains $200K

 

By Katharhynn Heidelberg
Daily Press Senior Writer
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, January 10, 2009 4:12 AM MST

MONTROSE — Claims that burglary suspect Michael Alvarado’s bond was excessive failed to persuade the judge to lower it Thursday.

Alvarado, 21, is suspected of breaking into Montrose Police Chief Tom Chinn’s home, with co-defendant Tyler Carr, 20, last January.

The two are also suspected in three other Montrose-area burglaries, which occurred in December 2007, Jan. 3, 2008 and April 24, 2008. Additionally, they have burglary cases in San Miguel County stemming from incidents in Sawpit in July of 2008.

Advertisement
Defense attorney Stephen Schweissing argued Thursday that Alvarado’s $200,000 bond was out of step with the offenses charged.

“I know the charges in this case are serious, but it’s my belief the bond in the current amount is excessive,” Schweissing said, telling Judge John Mitchel his client posed no threat to the community.

Assistant District Attorney Jerry Montgomery disagreed. Guns were stolen from Chinn’s residence and from the home of 2007’s burglary victim.

In Sawpit, authorities said two men, later identified as Alvarado and Carr, posed as housepainters before burgling homes. Alvarado was arrested on the Sawpit case in Commerce City, Colo., after he was found sleeping in a van outside a relative’s residence. (Carr later turned himself in).

Montgomery said Alvarado recently pleaded guilty to a class-3 felony in the Sawpit matter and his community corrections sentence was now “up in the air” because of the Montrose case.

“The flight risk is pretty high in this case. He has a lot at stake,” Montgomery said.

Schweissing said, however, that the Montrose charges are from offenses that predate Alvarado’s plea to the San Miguel County charges, so the implication Alvarado picked up a new case while awaiting sentencing was inaccurate.

Montgomery then presented a laundry list of offenses from Alvarado’s criminal history, including obstructing a peace officer, false reporting, probation violation, fugitive from justice, vehicle trespass, aggravated motor vehicle theft, DUI, shoplifting, failure to appear and traffic offenses.

Mitchel said the issue wasn’t just whether Alvarado would appear in court, but whether he posed a risk for committing crimes.

“There’s a series of five burglaries that we know about. The failures to appear were in 2008,” Mitchel said.

“Given all these circumstances, the motion to modify bail is denied.”

Alvarado returns to court Jan. 15. Carr is due in court Jan. 26. Both men have been formally charged with several counts of burglary and theft.

According to court records, Carr’s mother and Alvarado’s mother-in-law, Darlene Belarde, was charged with misdemeanor theft for her alleged role in helping sell one of the guns taken from Chinn’s house. Belarde’s next court date is Jan. 17.
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)