Montrose city staff presented its recommendations for a future river buffer ordinance to the community Wednesday during an open house at the Montrose Pavilion.
The pavilion’s meeting room was filled with large aerial maps of different sections of the Uncompahgre River, along with other creeks and waterways within city limits.
|
Advertisement |
Three RCOZs were proposed.
A 100-foot buffer, measured from the edge of the average yearly high water mark, would provide open space, room for recreation trails, and help to preserve the natural state of the river, said Senior City Planner Garry Baker.
“The (comprehensive) plan is clear about the 100-foot buffer, but we needed to elaborate on that,” he said.
The proposed conditional uses described by the city include bridge crossing, public streets and public utility crossing. It also includes plazas, outdoor cafes, kayak parks and other similar uses.
“Every (city) plan since 1978 has identified the river as an asset,” Baker said. “It’s asked for development that takes advantage of the river ... bait shops or cafes next to the river, they can make economic use of the river in an environmental way.”
Proposed prohibited uses include buildings, parking lots, feedlot operations, and detention/retention basins.
Staff plans also included a buffer averaging and incentives. The distance of a buffer may be reduced to 50 feet for up to 50 percent of the river frontage if different features, such as orientating a building towards the river or a 20-foot public trail corridor, are incorporated into the site.
Montrose resident Wayne Quade, who is also a retired Forest Service employee and member of FORU (Friends of the River Uncompahgre), said he would like to see an absolute minimum variance such as not within 50 feet of the river.
The maps also showed a 300-foot river corridor managed-use area proposed by the city. This buffer would include the 100-foot buffer, but extend pass that, prohibiting hazardous or sanitary waste landfills, auto or mobile home sales and wrecking yards to be placed within that area.
This buffer area is in line with the comprehensive plan, which states that the city will encourage low impact, environmentally friendly land used adjoining the river corridor zone.
“This is a good idea because it allows for drainage and wildlife corridors,” Quade said.
The proposed stream and creek buffer would be a 50-foot minimum area from the high water mark and the 300-foot buffer would not apply.
Along with public interest, the city is also considering the buffer zones now because there is less than half a dozen buildings within the boundaries of the 100-foot buffer.
“It’s something we need to do sooner than later,” Baker said. “We’ll compile comments (from the open house) and see where that puts us.”
Depending on the comments, there may or may not be more work on the ordinance. Baker said staff needs to know first if they are on the “right track.”
Contact Kati O’Hare via e-mail at katio@montrosepress.com



• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!