American history warrants National Archives strengthening

 

By Daily Press
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:13 AM MDT

There’s a little-known bill winding its way through Congress that would strengthen the power of the National Archives to require the White House and other executive branch agencies to preserve all electronic records. The national archivist would establish better procedures to check and certify that electronic data systems are indeed operating.

Like much in Washington, what prompted this action was a reaction.

Congressional investigators discovered that National Archive officials backed off from inspections of e-mail messages during the Bush administration. Missing were daily schedules of the president and vice-president and messages from top Bush appointees who used private Republican Party e-mail accounts to conduct public business. Curiously, emails and schedules from the run-up to the Iraqi War —  a war that has featured manipulated intelligence — are missing. Missing also is the outing of former CIA agent Valerie Plame and the decision to destroy interrogation tapes of Guantanamo detainees.

Advertisement
Warts and all have turned up in presidential libraries. In recent administrations: LBJ’s manipulations of getting the U.S. involved more deeply into the Vietnam War; Nixon’s Watergate undoing and Clinton’s Oval Office peccadilloes. This is history, American history, and Congress must act to protect it before more of it ends up missing.
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)