War Stories: Conger - We all made sacrifices

 

By Bill Swaim
Managing Editor
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:38 PM MDT

MONTROSE — The names that adorn the Moving Wall represent those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the Vietnam War. But for some Vietnam veterans, their sacrifice is coming now.

John Conger, 68, was drafted when he was 25. He served one tour with the Army’s 532nd Services and Supply, and, during his service, Conger was one of many veterans exposed to Agent Orange in the field. This is his sacrifice.

“I came down with (prostate) cancer from Agent Orange. For a lot of us, that was our sacrifice,” said Conger, a Specialist E-5 who served from 1967-68 in south Vietnam at Cam Ranh Bay. “We all made a lot of sacrifices.”

(Use arrows above to view more photos)

Advertisement
According to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, approximately 19 million gallons of herbicides were used in Vietnam between 1961 and 1971 to remove unwanted plant life and leaves which otherwise provided cover for enemy forces during the conflict.

Shortly following their military service in Vietnam, some veterans reported a variety of health problems and concerns attributed to exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicides. (For more, see information box).

There were plenty of tense moments for Conger, whose base was hit in January of 1968 during the Tet Offensive. During that battle, he said they captured 19 Viet Cong.

Conger worked in the mess hall, preparing three meals a day for 365 troops every day. And while he was one of the lucky ones to return home to his wife of 6 1/2 years and to his former job on the Denver water board (he retired after 36 years there before moving to Montrose eight years ago), Conger’s cousin, John Edward Conger, Jr., wasn’t so lucky. John Conger Jr. was killed in action and his body was never returned.

“He’s still over there — buried there somewhere in Vietnam, 41 years later,” Conger said.  “It’s sad.”

It’s also why the Moving Wall coming to Montrose is special for Conger.

“We can’t let people forget these veterans and the sacrifice they made for this country even though it was an unpopular war,” he said. “We still feel we did the right thing over there.”

Conger’s son has served 21 years in the Air Force, which included stints in Iraq. Conger said the two wars have some similarities, and called both political wars.

“They’re not letting the military do their job. If they aren’t going to let them do their job, they might as well bring them home,” he said. “Politics have to stay out of it.”

———

Agent Orange

When and where Agent Orange was used in Vietnam: 

Between 1961 and 1971, the U.S. military in South Vietnam used more than 19 million gallons  of herbicides for defoliation and crop destruction. Several types and combinations of chemicals were used.  These mixtures were identified by the color of the stripe on the storage drums. 

The three most common mixtures were Agent Orange, Agent White, and Agent Blue. Fifteen  different herbicides were shipped to and used in Vietnam. Most of the herbicides sprayed in  Vietnam were Agent Orange, which was used between January 1965 and April 1970.  Herbicides other than Agent Orange were used in Vietnam prior to 1965, but to a very limited extent. The total area sprayed with herbicides between 1962 and 1965 was quite small.  However, some  of the herbicides used in the early years contained greater concentrations of dioxin.

Spraying  occurred in all four military zones of Vietnam. Heavily sprayed areas included inland forests near the demarcation zone; inland forests at the  junction of the borders of Cambodia, Laos, and South Vietnam; inland forests north and northwest  of Saigon; mangrove forests on the southernmost peninsula of Vietnam; and mangrove forests along major shipping channels southeast of Saigon.

Health and exposure:

In the 1970s some veterans became concerned that exposure to Agent Orange caused health problems. One of the chemicals in Agent Orange contained minute traces of TCDD (dioxin), which caused a variety of illnesses in laboratory animals. More recent studies have suggested that the chemical may be related to a number of cancers and other health problems.

Source: U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments

    Chris Wilson wrote on Jan 29, 2010 6:29 AM:

    " Mabel, I just now saw your post. John Conger was my cousins uncle. Johns brother Ron Conger and his sons all work for the Lebanon Fire Department in Lebanon. Please email for contact information. "

    Mabel Maggard wrote on May 27, 2009 12:39 PM:

    " I work for a Ford Dealership in Lebanon OH. This year's Military App Day will be June 6th.I have been contacted by a former Marine who has worn the MIA bracelet of John E Conger Jr.for over 30 years. His request is to present a family member of John E Conger Jr his bracelet.Do you have contact with a family member of John E Conger Jr.Or do you know any of his family? I do not have much time. This year’s day is only a few days away. Any help or suggestion would be heartfelt. "


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)