Citizen group to be created for river corridor project

 

By Kati O’Hare
Daily Press Writer
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:08 AM MDT

MONTROSE  — A committee of community stakeholders will be created to establish a consistent river corridor plan for the city, as determined in Thursday’s City Council work session.

Senior City Planner Garry Baker went before council Thursday to update its members on the river corridor project and ultimately recommend that the city create a citizen group.

After several open houses on the project, Baker said major stakeholders were split on the different components of the project. He believes a smaller 11-member citizen committee could narrow down the ideas, creating a consistent plan that could be established into a city ordinance.

Advertisement
The city’s comprehensive plan is clear that there needs to be a 100-foot buffer between pavement or buildings and the river’s edge. However, details and exemptions need to be hammered out.

To apply for the committee, citizens must submit a letter of request to the city’s office, 433 S. First St., in care of City Clerk Teri Colvin. The letter should indicate their affiliation regarding the river corridor (land owner, interested citizen). Deadline is June 19.

After reviewing the letters of interest, city council will appoint the committee at its July 2 council meeting. The committee would probably meet about three times in August and early September, and present recommendations to council after, Baker said.

Baker said he’d like to see land owners, developers, realtors, river advocates, along with recreation and citizen interests, represented. He said the idea is to work with everyone first, to see if a consensus can be met.

Preserving the river corridor was one of the highest ranked objectives stated by the community during the 2008 comprehensive plan update process. This led the city staff to move forward with implementing the plan.

In January, the city held several open houses at the Montrose Pavilion to get input, during which large aerial maps of different sections of the Uncompahgre River, creeks and waterways within the city, were displayed.

Buffers, which are natural vegetation areas along waterways, were highlighted on the maps, along with details for the proposed River Corridor Overlay Zone (RCOZ). Three RCOZs were proposed.

A 100-foot buffer, measured from the edge of the average yearly high water mark, would provide open space, room for recreation trails, and help to preserve the natural state of the river, Baker said.

“The (comprehensive) plan is clear about the 100-foot buffer, but we needed to elaborate on that,” he said.

The proposed conditional uses described by the city include bridge crossing, public streets and public utility crossing. It also includes plazas, outdoor cafes, kayak parks and other similar uses.

“Every (city) plan since 1978 has identified the river as an asset,” Baker said. “It’s asked for development that takes advantage of the river ... bait shops or cafes next to the river, they can make economic use of the river in an environmental way.”

The maps also showed a 300-foot river corridor managed-use area proposed by the city. This buffer would include the 100-foot buffer, but extend pass that, prohibiting hazardous or sanitary waste landfills, auto or mobile home sales and wrecking yards to be placed within that area.

The plans also included a buffer averaging and incentives. The distance of a buffer may be reduced to 50 feet for up to 50 percent of the river frontage if different features, such as orientating a building towards the river or a 20-foot public trail corridor, are incorporated into the site.

More information on the project can be found on the city’s Web site, www.cityofmontrose.org and click on department services; planning & building; planning; river/stream overlay zone.

Contact Kati O’Hare via e-mail at katio@montrosepress.com

 
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments

    Hellena handbasket wrote on May 28, 2009 11:58 AM:

    " There need to be rules because the river is being abused. Businesses and the city aren't caring for it responsibly. The river should be the jewel of our town, not some overlooked drainage for storm drains and waste. "

    Common Man wrote on May 27, 2009 6:07 AM:

    " I hope somebody in this group asks the question "why do we need more rules". It seems special interests can make a mountain out of any mohill. "


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)