Both the general public and government employees should keep in mind certain constitutional protections of civil rights and civil liberties.
|
Advertisement |
The issue about the firefighter union bill vetoed by the governor is NOT whether the firefighters (or other government employees) may form or join an existing union. It IS about whether the employing agency is or is not required to recognize that association and bargain with it about working conditions.
If there is a strong, unified association among its employees, the governing authorities of a public agency would do well to recognize it and work with it to improve service to the citizens. The alternative is a cost ineffective drag on the morale and productivity of the workforce. In a public agency, the workforce is comprised of citizens also.
Any laws which seem to prohibit public agencies from recognizing unions are in violation of the constitutional protections for freedom of association.


steve wrote on Jun 25, 2009 1:23 AM:
to bald jim wrote on Jun 18, 2009 3:28 AM:
BaldJim wrote on Jun 17, 2009 10:40 AM:
You suggest there are NO dead-weight employees on the county payroll?
There are! But rather than being Union Members, they are the ones who contribute to the Republican Party's campaigns.
To paraphrase the TV show: "whose card is in your pocket?" "
BaldJim wrote on Jun 17, 2009 10:31 AM:
I have to agree with the persons commenting. The clock should be turned back. They should have to work again under the conditions which obtained before unions.
They don't know about that time. "
Govt Employee wrote on Jun 12, 2009 11:08 AM:
concerned res wrote on Jun 8, 2009 9:20 PM:
Taxed payer wrote on Jun 8, 2009 9:11 AM:
Get real wrote on Jun 7, 2009 10:42 AM:
truth hurts huh wrote on Jun 7, 2009 5:25 AM:
GET REAL wrote on Jun 6, 2009 6:32 PM: