Conspiracy & propaganda

Re: Bilberry letter, Daily Press, June 19

“Can she bake ‘a Barry Pie’ ~ Bilberry Ploy ~ ‘Bil-Barry’ Ploy ... Oh Charming Barry!”

Big Lull of “No Reply” to Jane’s Letter? (19th of June to the 26th?) (Montrose Daily Press: DUH! How about a discussion and response box? Which was not included with the letter ...perhaps because MDP wanted ‘no responses’ to this ‘propaganda?’)

Noticed that ‘No One On the White House Staff’ (Barry Included) said a word about WHY Costs of Medical Care in America have risen to these and this level ... nor in the Congress nor the Senate. No One has discussed nor will consider “TORT REFORM” and leveling the playing field in this country between “Union Medical-Dental-Eye Care Benefits with Union Wages” with those of Normal Non-Union Average Regular American Hard Worker Mom’s and Dads who work the regular 8 to 5 or maybe also a part time or a 2nd job...just trying to keep up.

The Difference between Union and Non-Union Wages and Benefits is Kept Secret in negotiations, because the Public would ‘Start Riots’ if they knew how much disparity existed in their Union Wages and Benefits, particularly Medical.

And Lawyers have driven this Apple Cart right to the Brink of America’s Economic and Capitalistic Destruction!

You want Socialized Medicine-Jane? Then Do it with the Unions and ALLLLL Federal and State AFSME Union Members and Congress and First! Form it and Participate with it for the remainder of Barry’s term (4 years) and then See if you can Win an Re-Election!

The ‘Spiral of Inequity’ between Union Benefits and yours and Mine is “MAJOR!”  Lawyers have been Suing Doctors out of Business with ‘malpractice’ for decades in America. STOP THEM!

(Montrose Daily Press: Why NO Discussion?  (Was this FREE Democrat Advertising/ Propaganda ... From the GO?) ........YOU”RE REALLY DISAPPOINTING!)

Chuck Rehfeldt

Montrose

(Editor’s Note: We removed the comments portion from our Letters to the Editor in May in an effort to restore some civility and respect to our online opinion. We publish and print more than 600 letters to the editor annually and value them. It isn’t a conspiracy to remove comments, rather a choice to make public dialogue more equitable. When a letter writer takes the time and affixes their name to a letter that will appear in print, they shouldn’t have to withstand anonymous (and often vicious) personal attacks. The new guidelines were published and posted online May 7; publisher Stephen Woody had a column about the changes on May 20.)