Citizens spoke of the need of jobs on the West End – the mill is planned to be near Paradox on private land owned by EF CEO, George Glasier. Others spoke out on the possibility of contamination. For the record, once again, the Daily Press’ editorial position on the mill: we’re not for it, nor are we against it. Our editorials have staked: Take your time, commissioners. Consult with experts in the field, get it right, expect litigation.
Some comments from Wednesday:
|
Advertisement |
• Dale Reed of Montrose, Uncompahgre Valley Association, said the mining industry has a “stained history. That the BOCC decision would leave a mark on the Paradox Valley for “thousands of years, long after the benefits of the jobs on the West End have evaporated.”
• Sandy Nelson of Hotchkiss, representing the Local Pipefitters 145: “This is a lot of work for our workers around the country. It is good for this country. If we don’t have the mill, we will be importing our uranium from somewhere else. We need this mill.”
The past and present are joined with a simple caveat: uranium mining and milling from sources like the now buried Uravan mill were, for decades, unregulated and very hazardous to workers and the environment; now they are somewhat less hazardous. Milling today is less hazardous for workers as mining, but it will leave a radioactive pile of tailings that five bucks says won’t be maintained in 200 years.
Energy Fuels says, in a recent report on radiation pathways sent to CDPHE, that “…main (mill) exposure (from particulate and radon gas sources)…. of people in proximity of the mill (include)… ore haulage, storage, and handling at the ore pad, grinding of the ore in the mill, mill tailings, transportation accidents involving the release of yellowcake.” Workers exposure? “….from inhalation of yellowcake dust, ore dust, and radon….and from exposure to gamma radiation from radionuclides outside their bodies”
The BOCC should take advantage of state funding of up to $50,000 and see if George Glasier is still willing to add to that amount and find some disinterested expertise to sort through the truly complex maze of environmental and public health questions on their plate.


Sue wrote on Sep 24, 2009 12:43 PM:
JudyJ wrote on Sep 16, 2009 8:34 PM:
1. How convenient that Mr. Glasier just happens to already own the land . . .
2. Creating jobs does seem admirable; however, selling crack creates jobs, too, does it not?
3. Pollution (water, air) MUST be the ultimate consideration, above all else. "