I gave it a month and a trip to another country to see if I felt any different before I asked for anyones opinion. On August 13th, one month ago my son was hit by a car while riding his bike with a buddy. 911 was not called immediately and the driver drove away from the scene after looking at them and saying "SORRY". My son and his friend who are both 12 Years old sat in the middle of Townsend helpless not knowling what to do next. His friend ended up helping him out of the the road and sitting him down on the sidewalk and calling me. His friend was unscathed. My son had a good gash on his leg apparently from the cars license plate, a large bruise on his chest, road rash on his arm and all the way up his leg. Here are the things that bother me the most: 1. After he was hit the driver fled. 2. He was hit into Townsend Ave. at 2:00 in the afternoon during the construction in front of Murdochs and not one person pulled over to help and not one construction worker cared enough to help either. 3. I called 911 when I got there and told the dispatcher to just have the police meet us at the ER. He was there when we got there, but quickly left when he heard the driver was back at the scene. He talked to my sons friend for 1 minute before he rushed out. He NEVER talked to my son for a statement. He came back and told us that it was my sons fault and nothing could be done. When I asked if she was in trouble for leaving he said "she is not all there" and had to go home and get her mom. Apparently she also has a time period to come back in and won't get in trouble for it 4. Why is someone who is "not all there" allowed to have a drivers license? I understand that everyone should have equal rights, but to hit someone and leave and "not know what to do" is just silly to me. 5. Just wondering if I am crazy for thinking that an appology is out of line even it wasn't her fault.
I went to get a copy of the accident report and talk to the officers sargeant and was even more frustrated. When I got back to work I read the report and saw that the only statement in the report was that of the girl (or her mother, who knows?) and not one word about the boys' side of the story. Who are we trying to protect here? I understand that he was at fault and did not know that until that day. Do all of you know that you have to dismount your bike before crossing a road? Do all of your kids know that? Please spread the word because even if your child dies in a biking accident and it was his fault, he will get the ticket. Maybe if this is a law it should be manditory to take a class to ride a bike just like a car. Just a thought.
|
Advertisement |
AGAIN I ASK WHO ARE WE TRYING TO PROTECT HERE, ITS DEFINATELY NOT OUR YOUTH. KEEP THEM OFF THE ROADS (AND SIDEWALKS). THEY ARE SAFER THAT WAY!


Broken Hearted wrote on Sep 30, 2009 6:49 AM:
concerned citizen wrote on Sep 25, 2009 4:23 PM:
thats how it should be every where. "
ME wrote on Sep 23, 2009 10:28 AM:
Come on how many times even this month have you heard about problems with the traffiic?
I bet the driver did not even have a valid lic. or insurance that is whey she left so fast. "
Barista wrote on Sep 22, 2009 7:11 AM:
What,
what the.. is what we call a troll, not a real poster, just someone trying to get attention.
We have a saying online, 'don't feed the trolls'
meaning don't respond to their posts and give them what they want.
I guess you could say their post is a satire of how they see Montrose (or the posters) meant to get a reaction, preferably one that will start a flame war :) "
watching wrote on Sep 22, 2009 7:03 AM:
Do we have a police force that tickets or educates the bike riders? a bike police? Should we? "
Maria wrote on Sep 21, 2009 8:47 PM:
That's how it was explained to me by a police officer. They also said, if there is a crosswalk, the pedestrian must have stepped into the road before you have to yield. Which is confusing and scary! So, how about this, pedestrians and people in cars look out for and respect each other.
Accidents happen, and thankfully this boy was not seriously hurt! Now let's learn from this and move on! "
Native wrote on Sep 21, 2009 6:45 PM:
Native wrote on Sep 21, 2009 6:45 PM:
Gonna B. Sick wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:53 PM:
JP wrote on Sep 21, 2009 3:16 PM:
That’s how I understand it too. And yes, it's really confusing! When I'm walking around town, this is the rule I use:
GIVE THE HEAVY CAR THE RIGHT OF WAY – NO MATTER WHAT!
Seriously, no matter who is at fault, the pedestrian will always lose! "
Local Rules wrote on Sep 21, 2009 8:34 AM:
You're correct with the statute, but slightly off on how other laws interact with it. Essentially, you're right, where there is no crosswalk, you just go from sidewalk to sidewalk (crosswalk is implied). However, when there is no crosswalk, cars have right of way (unless the pedestrian in already in the road). Meaning, when there is no crosswalk, pedestrians must wait for traffic. When there is a crosswalk, traffic must wait for pedestrians. But in either instance, if pedestrian is already in the road, traffic must stop. Confusing, I know! "
WHAT wrote on Sep 20, 2009 5:10 PM:
" dont yore kid no he aint got no rights here in montorse? he needs to stay off streets unless he wants the biznes end of my truck shoved up his snoot. whats he doin out of skool anyhow?
______
Obviously you didn't stay in school! Or in your words "skool." Studipity is very active in Montrose. "
Parent wrote on Sep 20, 2009 1:45 PM:
Entertained Po-Po wrote on Sep 20, 2009 6:16 AM:
I admit I am not familiar with the brochure you’re talking about. Nonetheless, it’s irrelevant because the code the City of Montrose adopted (as most municipalities have) and is bound by, the “Model Traffic Code,” is what the police and court base their decisions on. In the MTC, crosswalk is defined exactly the same as in State statute. So, you’re right, local laws can be more restrictive; however, regarding this issue, they are not. "
Local Rules wrote on Sep 19, 2009 10:17 PM:
Local laws that further restrict state statues for public safety prevail. Meaning LOCAL LAW applies.
For all of you curious about this, the City of Montrose has a great pedestrian brochure (available online at the city website). It clearly states that in the City of Montrose if there is no crosswalk, then the car always has right of way. "
Entertained Po-Po wrote on Sep 19, 2009 5:40 PM:
That means painted lines or not, if you can naturally imagine (so to speak) lines in the roadway starting from where the sidewalk ends, it's a "crosswalk." This is not my thought, it's State statute.
Now if the little dude was hauling rear right in front of a car, common sense applies, just like a person jumping in front of a car. Witness statements would be the key here. "
Entertained Po-Po wrote on Sep 19, 2009 5:40 PM:
Although I agree mostly with all the "get over it mom" comments, TECHNICALLY, there is an argument that the kid was in the right. One CAN ride a bike on the sidewalk, one CAN ride across a crosswalk, and one DOES have all the same rights as a pedestrian while doing so (although when it comes down to the two, bikes must yield to pedestrians). As far as the "no crosswalk" thing goes, get educated and read this:
continued... "
Justme wrote on Sep 19, 2009 7:32 AM:
JWeee wrote on Sep 18, 2009 4:34 PM:
4th gen wrote on Sep 18, 2009 4:04 PM:
My o My wrote on Sep 18, 2009 2:53 PM:
I reiterate my previous position. "Concerned mom" was NOT THERE! Meaning she doesn’t know whether ANYONE saw the accident or not. But still condemns EVERYONE as if they were there and did see it and didn’t help. Obviously, you agree with her (even though, once again, SHE WAS NOT THERE).
I too would have stopped and helped. As would 90+% of people. Unlike you, I have faith in and consider the people of Montrose to be some of the nicest people in the world. Obviously, you and "concerned mom" disagree. "
Tim wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:40 PM:
Patrick wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:01 PM:
patrick wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:51 PM:
Justme wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:43 PM:
really wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:15 PM:
yes I did get a ticket, and you have to have an accident report to turn it into your insurance. My dad did the same thing, he hit a dog, and only had a few minutes to get to the bank to cash his check, so he continued to the bank. when he got home called the police reported the dog and met the officer on scene. He got heavily fined and had to appear in court twice for leaving the scene. "
what the.. wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:04 PM:
Native wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:28 PM:
Native wrote on Sep 17, 2009 2:20 PM:
I am sorry...but I just don't think that checking on a kid that was just hit or bumped by a car right in front of you is babysitting nor is it a parent not doing their job. It is simply the right thing to do. At least that is how I was raised, and how I raise my children. If some one is in need of help then you go out of your way to help them. And this is not the first time someone has been hit and ignored by anyone that saw. "
Dee wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:38 PM:
Thank you for saying exactly what I was thinking! I think your assessment is absolutely correct!
Glad her son was ok! Scary for any parent… "
James wrote on Sep 17, 2009 11:41 AM:
I think you're absolutely right! I did the exact same thing as a kid. Well, I would slow down, but that was about it. Thankfully, I was never hit. And thankfully, this boy was not seriously hurt!
Of course, unlike this mom, my mom would have beat my behind because I was acting stupid... not tried to blame everyone else! "
Oldguy wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:16 AM:
I agree. I can't believe "Really" would get a ticket for that. Especially if they only left the scene to call the police. I'm probably a bit older than most on here, but that's what we all had to do before cell phones. Not to mention, like you said, you don't get a ticket for hitting a deer... or at least I never have (nor anyone I know).
Must be more to the story… "
Let It Be wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:40 AM:
sports fan wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:37 AM:
There isn't a crosswalk at that intersection. "
JGP wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:29 AM:
You’re correct! However, you missed a couple of very applicable points. The law is simple, pedestrians must give cars sufficient time and distance to stop BEFORE entering a crosswalk (or the pedestrian is at fault). Meaning a pedestrian can’t just jump in front of a car (on foot or on a bike) and the cars at fault.
And when there is no crosswalk (like in this instance), the car ALWAYS has the right of way. ALWAYS!
PS: “HONESTY” I agree that that is exactly how it happened! "
Honest opinion wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:08 AM:
What wrote on Sep 16, 2009 10:21 PM:
You got a ticket for leaving the scene of a hit deer? Hitting a deer isnt considered an accident. You dont have to stop for a hit deer. However, you cant shoot the deer afterwards to put it out of its misery, that will get you into trouble. "
According to Colorado Law wrote on Sep 16, 2009 8:03 PM:
What are you supposed to do if you are riding your bicycle on the sidewalk and you come to a crosswalk? Here's the law
(c) A person riding or walking a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk shall have all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances. "
according to CO law wrote on Sep 16, 2009 7:53 PM:
Honesty wrote on Sep 16, 2009 3:45 PM:
Trisha wrote on Sep 16, 2009 3:35 PM:
You're absolutely right! The mom just does not get that. I bet she is under the impression that laws were enacted just to get her son in trouble! "
Trisha wrote on Sep 16, 2009 3:31 PM:
It has to do with this mom making a mountain out of a molehill. Her son rode in front of a car and got bumped. The driver saw the kid was not really hurt (even though mom acts like he was in a coma) and apologized. The driver then realized they better go back just to make sure the boy was ok. In the meantime, mom decided her son being hurt was the sign of the apocalypse and is out for blood.
No tickets were written because it was a stupid inconsequential accident! "
really wrote on Sep 16, 2009 3:09 PM:
Reality wrote on Sep 16, 2009 1:04 PM:
Actually, that’s exactly what we are trying to do and exactly why bicycle laws were put into place. To PROTECT people riding bikes! Either you did not teach your son the law/rules or your son did not follow the law/rules and he got hurt (thankfully not bad).
But yes, those laws were put in place to protect people… and if your son had followed the law, this accident would never have happened! "
Mount Rose wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:29 PM:
Take a Chill Pill wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:16 PM:
From reading your rant (I mean letter), I can assure you, that that driver is not the only person who is not “all there.”
Glad your son is ok though. Now move on with your life. This is not a federal case. I can assure you, quite contrary to what you suggest in your rant (I mean letter), the entire city is not conspiring against you! "
From Elsewhere wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:50 AM:
My o My wrote on Sep 16, 2009 9:50 AM:
With respect, how do you know people saw this and did nothing? I understand "concerned mom" is under the impression that society must raise her son for her and therefore EVERYONE (but her) saw this happen, but maybe those construction people were busy working and maybe those people in cars were paying attention to the traffic. And so maybe they didn’t realize it was their job to babysit her son for her and therefore didn’t see him get hit. Just a thought… I mean Lord forbid a parent take parenting responsibility for their own child! "
watching wrote on Sep 16, 2009 8:02 AM:
are there 2 sets of bike rules?
the reason I ask is i can not see letting a little kid ride their bike on the road like the adult riders do.
Everyone says learn the bike laws, but how will they react to seeing a kid riding in the street?
Is there an age that separates who rides on the sidewalk and follows the pedestrian laws and who rides in the road and follow those laws? "
Chickenman wrote on Sep 16, 2009 7:32 AM:
First you should teach you kids basic saftey when riding in town and should have avodid riding in construction zone .
Second drivers should never assume what kids are going to do, kids are kids, adults should know kids will do stupid things and be extra careful in construction zone especiallly with kids, workers and pedestrians..Cops can only do so much, but should have cited driver for leaving scene Think folks CM "
note wrote on Sep 16, 2009 7:30 AM:
grandmother wrote on Sep 15, 2009 10:18 PM:
concerned res wrote on Sep 15, 2009 7:17 PM:
I'm glad that your son is o.k.-now move on with your life with a cheap lesson. "
Native wrote on Sep 15, 2009 7:07 PM:
Even though no one "had" to help or check on this boy doesn't mean they shoudn't have...I know if I was hit by a car I would appriciate some help. Good samaritin people. Not just a story, a lesson. "
Josh J wrote on Sep 15, 2009 6:35 PM:
Interesting that people keep complaining about drivers in this town (but obviously excluding themselves, I'm sure). The accident was caused because this lady's son broke the law. Putting aside the fact the driver left the scene, the accident was NOT the drivers fault. This type of accident could happen to any driver (even the good ones commenting on here) when someone on a bicycle BREAKS THE LAW! See laws are kind of put into place for just this reason! "
HA wrote on Sep 15, 2009 4:41 PM:
PS: I'm sorry, but I have to say this: You're massively overreacting to a simple situation that your own son is responsible for. Stop blaming everyone else, accept responsibility and move on with your life! "
also a mother wrote on Sep 15, 2009 4:28 PM:
info wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:33 PM:
The Police Department does offer bicycle safty events for people to learn, and these are free of cost if I remember correctly.
Also such laws are to PROTECT people in the first place. Always a good idea to vote. ;) "
Cynic wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:23 PM:
patrick wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:01 PM:
wow wrote on Sep 15, 2009 1:39 PM:
honest opinion wrote on Sep 15, 2009 1:30 PM:
Montrose Citizen wrote on Sep 15, 2009 12:57 PM:
bike dad wrote on Sep 15, 2009 9:11 AM:
montrose mom wrote on Sep 15, 2009 9:08 AM:
Second of all...I am getting a little tired of everyone blaming the car! Not just bicyclists (who never know the proper laws and rules for riding their bikes), but "
montrose mom wrote on Sep 15, 2009 9:07 AM:
I don't care who has the right of way...if the car is bigger, you would be wise to be cautious and WAIT until it is clear. But maybe you wish to be hit and killed... just to prove that you had the right of way. Silly me. "
Jen wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:21 AM:
Native wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:16 AM:
Native wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:16 AM: