Capturing new retail

 

By Kati O’Hare
Daily Press Writer
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, September 30, 2009 4:13 AM MDT

MONTROSE  — A south-end developer has a new incentive method to recruit new retail business to the area and expand the retail sales-tax base.

Recently, the Montrose City Council approved changes to its sales tax ordinance that allows the developer to place a PIF, or Public Improvement Fee, on Oxbow Crossing and River Landing tenants.

“In the last 10 years, we are the only one (large retail shopping center) in the state to be developed without a PIF,” Matt Miles, Montrose developer of Oxbow Crossing and River Landing, said.

Advertisement
A PIF is not a tax, but a fee that is imposed on business owners or tenants in a certain area identified in the PIF. In this case, it is Oxbow Crossing and River Landing shopping centers. The developer requires tenants to collect a PIF on their customers’ sales transactions to pay for the improvements on their site. The fee collected repays the capital costs incurred by the developer for the construction of public improvements in the PIF area such as curbs and sidewalks, and road development, according to city staff.

For the full PIF contract, see the city’s Web site “archive” at www.cityofmontrose.org. and view the Sept. 19 city council meeting packet. (See related story.)

———

For the full story, see today's print edition. The online story may not reflect all relevant information that was reported. We encourage readers to obtain the full story by reading the print edition or our e-edition, To subscribe, call (970) 252-7081 or click on the subscription link on the main page.
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments

    What wrote on Sep 30, 2009 9:57 AM:

    " Now...remind me why we are doing this for Oxbow/River Landing and not Main Street. It seems to me the Oxbow area has plenty of retailers doing fine. They are out there paying that high of rent for a reason. If they are not doing fine, then they should realize what high of rent will do for you. I just wonder if the city has thought about where their revenue is going to come from. The busy part of town is getting a credit against their tax. The old part of town does not have business. Horse Pucky! I am discouraged. "

    walks like a duck wrote on Sep 30, 2009 8:55 AM:

    " fee or tax, does it really matter what you call it, the consumer is paying it, it removes their buying power just like the falling dollar, inflation is a tax, this is a tax for the developer recoup the losses incurred on the bad decision to build. a reward for bad decision making. This PIF is what will be proposed by the downtown business improvement district to further line their own pockets and subsidize their own greedy interests at the expense of taxpayers. "

    angery tax payor wrote on Sep 30, 2009 8:38 AM:

    " PIF call it what you want it is just another way get money from the consumer. The developer should be responsible for sidewalks, curbs, ect. "

    Great Idea wrote on Sep 30, 2009 8:17 AM:

    " This is a great idea. We need more buisnesses to close in montrose since the rest are doing so well. When is this town going to realize how anti business they are. Does everyone not realize that this attitude is why the recession has hit us so hard. But then again, that is what the "antibusiness" city planners are all about. "

    D.E.ROSE wrote on Sep 30, 2009 6:47 AM:

    " CALL IT WHAT YOU WANT TO BUT SURE SOUNDS LIKE ANOTHER TAX TO ME- OF COURSE THE BUSINESSES AFFECTED WILL HAVE TO PASS ON THE ADDED COST TO THE CONSUMER- WHAT ELSE CAN IT BE????? "


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)