Losing access: Residents concerned over driveway removals

 

By Kati O’Hare
Daily Press Writer
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 4:14 AM MDT

MONTROSE  — When Montrose renter Christine Allen arrived home from work last week, she was surprised to see her driveway gone and a steep curb blocking any access.

Around Allen’s home at 601 N. Second St., the city is reconfiguring several drainage systems. Crews are removing metal drainage culverts that run parallel to Park Avenue between North First and North Third streets, replacing them with concrete valley pans. Curb, gutter and sidewalk construction is also part of the project.

Allen and her neighbors were made aware of the construction plans. However, some citizens did not realize that construction meant the loss of access to their garages from the street.

City staff removed Barrett Beshoar's driveway to his garage at 548 N. Second St. and are planning to expand the curb to the alleyway. The city said they would put a "drivable surface" so Beshoar's could access the garage from the alley. (Joel Blocker / Daily Press)

Advertisement
“I can’t park where my driveway was,” said Bogdan Bugalski, who’s owned his home at 200 N. Park Ave. for about 27 years.

Until last week, Bogdan and his wife, Bozena, who are both retired and on disability, were able to pull into their driveway off of Park Avenue, and park their two vehicles right in front of their garage. This enabled them to walk through their gate and into their home.

Now, the driveway is gone and a tall curb blocks any access from the street. Bogdan is using the alley, but because of a utility pole — which he has no right to move because it’s inches outside his property — he has to park perpendicular to his garage, barely fitting one vehicle.

Removing driveways is primarily a safety issue, city spokesperson David Spear said. Vehicles backing out onto a major arterial roadway, like Park, are dangerous. Using alleyway access or parking on the street is safer.

———

For the full story, see today's print edition. The online story may not reflect all relevant information that was reported. We encourage readers to obtain the full story by reading the print edition or our e-edition, To subscribe, call (970) 252-7081 or click on the subscription link on the main page.
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments

    3rd genration nbative wrote on Oct 15, 2009 1:12 PM:

    " be careful how loud you complain you might find your self without any reasonably and safe access to your home and or business like and long time business person did on our famous truck bypass "

    Concerned wrote on Oct 14, 2009 4:29 PM:

    " I am sure I am speeking for alot of people when I say this is wrong! The city government is out of control and rather than get lawyers involved get people together and stand up for yourselves. Go to the city council. Get the city government cleaned up. I'd like to see if one of their homes and property values were being effected how far this would go! "

    native son wrote on Oct 13, 2009 7:11 PM:

    " Hehe and Agreed,
    The City may have the right to do it, and probably will get their way in the end. However, I think the point is the direction that the current administration is taking is out of touch, indifferent to the citizens of Montrose, and pretty much arrogant. Of course, they will defend their actions, but the actions speak much louder than words. "

    Agreed wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:54 AM:

    " Hehe,

    You're right on the money. I find it amazing that people don't get that. These people would be suing themselves and everyone else in town. And as must as people are complaining, the fact is, the city had the right to do it. So the city would just spend money (tax money) to defend what they had the right to do. And EVERYONE would pay for it. "

    Hehe wrote on Oct 11, 2009 7:03 PM:

    " I love the people that keep saying to get a lawyer, as if the city if a an actual person they can sue. YOU ARE THE CITY! They will be suing you. And when they win, YOU will be paying them.

    Now, I'm not sure of the details, but chances are, the city had the right to do it. And if so, YOU will be paying to defend that lawsuit... which probably has no merit. "

    SKS wrote on Oct 10, 2009 1:33 PM:

    " Admittedly, I don’t know all the details. However, on the surface it appears that the City of Montrose has removed pre-existing, historic access to a number of private properties. As a result of recent construction the City is effectively denying historic access to those private owners. I would recommend that the affected owners seek an out of county attorney and pursue a law suit to restore access to the properties, recover damages and be compensated for all attorney’s fees and court costs. "

    Billy wrote on Oct 10, 2009 8:43 AM:

    " The city thinks that the first idea and the easiest idea is always the best idea. We know this is not true. One person with a good attorney could bring this to a head. Get going! "

    Amazed wrote on Oct 8, 2009 10:28 AM:

    " To Really


    What part of this looks to you like a week of inconvenience? The driveways were taken out and CURBS put in place. "

    Crash wrote on Oct 8, 2009 9:36 AM:

    " A "safety issue"?! Mr. Speer, was the police department consulted to see how many crashes have occurred due to people backing out onto Park? Since 1994, I can't recall a single one! "

    Mel wrote on Oct 7, 2009 11:18 PM:

    " I hope that all in involved obtain a lawyer and fight this to the end. I think this is about as straight as a corkscrew. "

    amazed wrote on Oct 7, 2009 11:13 PM:

    " I would like to say I am amazed but not surprised. It is sad too see that Montrose government has forgotten the rights of its citizens. I think this is a case of "What's done is done what you going to do about it?" These properties were built with building permits and driveway access permits that were granted. Is there not a LEGAL process that takes away that access? Not just the city doing whatever they want when they want? "

    carl wrote on Oct 7, 2009 9:54 PM:

    " and now the city is saying it is unsafe to access their driveway from park??? i guess if it serves the citys needs they can do whatever they want to your property. i am so sorry these people have to go through this, whos next???? "

    Really wrote on Oct 7, 2009 5:28 PM:

    " Nobody is willing to be inconvenienced for a week or so for the bigger picture. Oh yeah, I forgot, it is just so much easier to cause a stink and get people on your band wagon than to put up with it until the project is done. They are going to have to deal with it anyway, it isn't like complaining is going to make their lives easier. I would be ashamed if that were me. "

    Unknown To Me wrote on Oct 7, 2009 12:12 PM:

    " You have lived in Montrose for 27 years are disabled, retired and own your home. The city granted a permit to build and access to the roadway was given but now it's in the best interests of the commuity to take away any and all rights you may have. Welcome to the new Montrose. All those affected should find a real good attorney and be prepared to take your case as far as it needs to go. To hold the city liable for not compensating those who's property rights and values have been affected. "

    Brillant wrote on Oct 7, 2009 9:51 AM:

    " Brillant!!!!!
    City tax dollars at work. Is the City also going to pick up their garages and turn them 90 degrees to get in from the alley?
    Brillant!!!! "

    final blunder wrote on Oct 7, 2009 9:19 AM:

    " city planners are putting in " valley pans" to allow free flow of water to drain to the river, I dont think one of those 'planners', and I use that term loosely, took into consideration the 8' pipe lying below most of Main street and the finite amount of water it can carry, look for street flooding on main street in the near future. these guys are not planners, there soakers, and itsyou and me getting soaked. "

    Amazed wrote on Oct 7, 2009 8:00 AM:

    " Why in the world would the city think they could make someones property unusable? Oh Yeah, eminent domain. You have just diminished the property value, may as well lower the property taxes, help the renters get lower rent. This is one of the most insane things I have heard the city doing in a long time. Are they following the DOT in making it hard to get into businesses along S Townsend? "


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)