The review, which comes after a lawsuit brought by San Miguel County and several environmental groups, will be used to determine whether the sage-grouse qualifies for protection under the Endangered Species Act.
The FWS said in a press release that it intends to complete the review by the lawsuit settlement date of June 30, 2010.
|
Advertisement |
The agency issued a finding in 2006, stating ESA listing for the Gunnison sage-grouse was unwarranted because its rangewide population was stable and there were no significant threats to the species.
But a Department of the Interior investigative report on the Bush Administration’s application of the ESA found that officials interfered with federal biologists’ decision-making process for several species, including the Gunnison sage-grouse.
In March, Fish and Wildlife filed notice of intent to reconsider its earlier denial of the ESA listing for the grouse.
San Miguel County Commissioner Art Goodtimes said the feds would be welcomed back at the table. He said though regional conservation groups have done a good job trying to protect the sage-grouse, federal resources would be a boon.
“San Miguel County would be happy to see them review this,” he said. “We want them to re-examine, based on the science, not the politics, which we know happened in this case. We hope the Fish and Wildlife Service will be good partners at the table.”
Goodtimes said that when San Miguel County and the other groups brought suit, they alleged the feds had quashed scientific information showing the species needed protection.
”””
For the full story, see today's print edition. The online story may not reflect all relevant information that was reported. We encourage readers to obtain the full story by reading the print edition or our e-edition, To subscribe, call (970) 252-7081 or click on the subscription link on the main page.
• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.
• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point.
• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!